1. What does the levy cover?
The levy covers 15 percent of the district's budget. It pays for textbooks, computers, classroom teachers, teaching assistants, arts programs, athletics, transportation, special education programs, before and after-school tutoring and more.
2. How much does the levy cost taxpayers?
The levy will not exceed $3.53 per $1,000 of assessed property value - the same rate as passed by voters in 2002. It replaces - not adds to - the previous levy. It is based on an estimated growth rate of 5 percent, a conservative estimate. If the growth rate is higher than 5 percent, the tax rate will be less than $3.53. In the last 15 years, the district's average annual growth rate has been more than 10 percent.
3. How does the levy help student learning?
State and federal governments provide only 80 to 85 percent of district money. The levy fills the gap. Bethel depends on local money to improve student learning. Since the last levy, district test scores have increased more than any other district its size.
4. How else has student achievement improved?
The number of students in Advanced Placement classes has gone up five-fold since 2002, the district won a national technology award in 2005, and students and staff earned the top arts awards in Pierce County in 2004 and 2005.
5. Does levy money buy textbooks?
The district has spent about $2.4 million on textbooks since 2003. New textbooks include math, English, and foreign languages. The district relies heavily on levy funds to buy textbooks. Math, social studies and science textbooks are scheduled to be purchased with funds from the 2006 levy.
6. How does the levy help teachers improve?
Teacher training is an important part of levy funds. Bethel offers offer dozens of classes for teachers to improve their skills. Turnout is at an all-time high. Recently the district's professional development program won a top award, recognizing it as one of the best in the state.
7. How is class size affected by the levy?
Keeping class sizes down is a priority. The district uses levy dollars to hire teachers and teacher aides. Without the levy, the district would be forced to cut classroom personnel - a move that would lead to larger classes and fewer program offerings.
8. When was the last levy election?
In April 2002, 67 percent of district voters supported the four-year levy. The 2006 levy replaces the expiring one. Without it, the district will lose 15 percent of its operating budget.
1. Why did the school board vote to run a building bond?
Bethel is one of the state's fastest growing districts. Schools are packed - more than 17,750 students in schools built to accommodate 14,037. The problem is most severe at elementary and junior high levels.
2. How overcrowded are Bethel schools?
Twenty-one of 24 schools exceed capacity. Cedarcrest Jr. High was built to accommodate 560 students; this year it has 903. Pioneer Valley, Naches Trail and Graham elementary schools all have about 300 more students than they were built to handle.
3. What's on the bond?
It will build two new elementary schools, one new junior high, Spanaway and Clover Creek Elementary replacements; Spanaway Lake High and Shining Mountain Elementary renovations; satellite transportation facility/central kitchen; and a new professional-technical skills center. It will also purchase sites for three future schools and make improvements at every school in the district.
4. Who chose the projects?
A 62-person facilities advisory committee spent months examining district needs to come up with the list. They addressed intense overcrowding, as well as needs in each school. Earlier this year, the school board approved their recommendations.
5. Where will the new schools be built?
Based on growth patterns, the most likely sites for the new schools are: 176th Street E & 74th Street E. for the first elementary school, next to Frontier Jr. High in Graham for the second elementary school, and next to Pioneer Valley Elementary (73rd and Eustis Hunt Road) for the junior high school.
6. How much will the state provide in matching funds?
About $62 million. That would cover about 28 percent of the cost of all the projects. The district gets no matching funds unless voters approve the bond.
7. How much does the bond cost taxpayers?
The district has structured the bond not to exceed $2.09 per $1,000 of assessed property value. This $2.09 figure includes outstanding debt from the 2001 bond. With intensive new construction and an increased population, rates may actually drop when taxes are collected.
8. What was the result of the last bond?
In February 2001, 61 percent of district voters supported the bond. The 2006 bond is set at the same tax rate. All of the construction projects from the 2001 bond are either complete or nearly complete. Each was finished on-time and on-budget. Without the 2006 bond, school construction and major repairs will come to a halt.
| Two new elementary schools | $37 million |
| Elementary school property acquisition | $2.5 million |
| One new junior high | $27 million |
| Satellite bus facility | $10 million |
| Property acquisition for bus facility | $3.5 million |
| Professional-technical skills center/kitchen | $16 million |
| Property acquisition for skills center | $3.5 million |
| Property acquisition for future high school | $9 million |
| Spanaway Lake High modernization | $38 million |
| New Spanaway Elementary | $19 million |
| New Clover Creek Elementary | $20 million |
| Shining Mountain Elem. modernization | $10 million |
| Spanaway Jr. High - funds to expand facility to 100,000 square feet | $4.5 million |
| science room conversions | $3 million |
| Technology improvements (new computers, wiring) | $6 million |
| Security and safety upgrades | $2.5 million |
| Heating and ventilation improvements | $4 million |
| Roof replacements | $2 million |
| Floor replacements | $1.5 million |
| Field and grounds improvements | $5 million |
| Parking lot and bus loop improvements | $2.5 million |
| Hazard mitigation work | $2 million |
| Miscellaneous (classroom walls, libraries, septic systems, cafeteria expansion, etc) | $8.5 million |
| Local share | $175 million |
| State matching funds | $62 million |
| Total of all projects | $237 million |